Quality of Life and Shoulder Motion after Surgery for Breast Cancer: Physical Therapy Focus

Authors

  • Maíra Dantas Silva Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS). Aracaju (SE), Brasil.
  • Mariana Tirolli Rett Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). São Paulo (SP), Brasil. Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS). Aracaju (SE), Brasil.
  • Andreza Carvalho Rabelo Mendonça Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS). Aracaju (SE), Brasil.
  • Walderi Monteiro da Silva Júnior Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil. Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS). Aracaju (SE), Brasil.
  • Vanessa Miranda Prado Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde de São Paulo (FACIS ). São Paulo (SP), Brasil. Clínica OncoHematos. Aracaju (SE), Brasil.
  • Josimari Melo DeSantana University of Iowa. Estados Unido s(EUA). Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS). Aracaju (SE), Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2013v59n3.508

Keywords:

Breast Neoplasms-surgery, Mastectomy, Physical Therapy Specialty, Quality of Life, Range of Motion, Articular, Exercise Therapy

Abstract

Introduction: Complications after surgery for breast cancer can cause injury in range of motion of the shoulder and a negative impact considering the quality of life. Objective: To evaluate the range of motion and quality of life before and after ten sessions of physiotherapy in postoperative of breast cancer. Method: A clinical self-controlled trial was conducted involving 36 women. The range of motion was assessed by goniometry of homolateral and contralateral (control) shoulder. Quality of life was evaluated by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Breast Cancer Module (BR-23). The dependent and independent Student t test was used with p<0.05. Results: After the 10th sessionwe found a significant improvement in flexion (p<0.001), extension (p<0.001), abduction (p<0.001), adduction (p <0.010), medial rotation (p<0.011) and lateral rotation (p<0.020). When compared to the control member, such movements were similar except abduction that, although close to functional values, was still lower than the control limb (p<0.029). There was a significant improvement of physical function (p=0.004), pain reduction (p=0.046), financial difficulties (p=0.008) and symptoms in the arm (p=0.019). Conclusion: The physiotherapeutical approach improved the range of motion and quality of life in women after surgery for breast cancer. It is suggested that accompaniments for longer time may bring additional benefits.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2013-09-30

How to Cite

1.
Dantas Silva M, Tirolli Rett M, Carvalho Rabelo Mendonça A, Monteiro da Silva Júnior W, Miranda Prado V, Melo DeSantana J. Quality of Life and Shoulder Motion after Surgery for Breast Cancer: Physical Therapy Focus. Rev. Bras. Cancerol. [Internet]. 2013 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 Dec. 26];59(3):419-26. Available from: https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/508

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE