Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Aged 25 to 64 Years: Indicators of the First Cytopathological Examination Registered at Siscolo, 2007-2013

Authors

  • Maria Beatriz Kneipp Dias Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA). Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5847-9830
  • Luciana Leite de Mattos Alcântara Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Instituto Alberto Luiz Coimbra de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Engenharia (Coppe). Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2309-6976
  • Vania Reis Girianelli Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sérgio Arouca (Ensp). Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8690-9893
  • Arn Migowski Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA). Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4861-2319
  • Caroline Madalena Ribeiro Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA). Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2690-5791
  • Jeane Tomazelli Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA). Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2472-3444

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2022v68n1.1520

Keywords:

health information systems, uterine cervical neoplasms, papanicolaou test, mass screening, time series studies

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical cancer has high rates of incidence and mortality in women in Brazil. Monitoring of control actions has been limited to the number of tests performed and not to the women examined due to the lack of a unique identifier in the information system. Objective: To analyze indicators of cervical cancer screening actions among women aged 25-64 years with a record of the first cytopathological examination reported at Siscolo from 2007 to 2013. Method: Study of time series of indicators of cervical cancer screening actions were calculated for women aged 25-64 years who had their first cytopathological exam identified at Siscolo between 2007 and 2013. Trend analysis was performed using Prais-Winsten regression. Result: The uptake indicator showed an increasing trend only in the South (p=0.038) while overall positivity (any cytopathological alteration) remained stationary in the country (p≥0.108). Transformation zone sampling rate showed a decreasing trend in all regions (p<0.05), while the ratio between high-grade intraepithelial lesion and squamous cell carcinoma showed an increasing trend in the Northeast (10.3 in 2007 to 13.3 in 2013), Southeast (17.5 to 20.2) and South (20.2 to 30.4) regions. Conclusion: The increasing ratio between high-grade lesion and cancer in three regions of the country indicates a good screening performance in these locations. Indicators with a stationary trend and a decreasing trend in the transformation zone sampling rate need monitoring.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Schiffman M, Wentzensen N. Human papillomavirus infection and the multistage carcinogenesis of cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22(4):553-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1406

Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Diretrizes brasileiras para o rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero. 2. ed. rev. atual. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2016.

World Health Organization. Cancer control: knowledge into action: WHO guide for effective programmes [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007 [cited 2020 Oct 23]. (Early Detection; module 3). Available from: http://www.who.int/cancer/modules/Early%20Detection%20Module%203.pdf

Instituto Nacional de Câncer José de Alencar Gomes da Silva. Sistemas de informação do controle do câncer de mama (SISMAMA) e do câncer do colo do útero (SISCOLO): manual gerencial. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2011.

Screening and Immunisations Team (NHS Digital); PHE, Screening (Public Health England). Cervical screening programme, England - 2019-20 [NS] [Internet]. England: NHS Digital; 2020 Nov 26 [cited 2020 Dec 10]. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/cervical-screening-annual/england---2019-20

National Screening Unit [Internet]. Wellington, NZ: NSU; c2022. Cervical screening coverage; 2016 Apr 6 [cited 2020 Oct 23]. Available from: https://www.nsu.govt.nz/health-professionals/national-cervical-screening-programme/cervical-screening-coverage

Cervical cancer screening program 2015: annual report [Internet]. Vancouver, BC: BC Cancer Agency; 2015 [cited 2020 Nov 12]. Available from: http://www.bccancer.bc.ca/screening/Documents/CCSP_Report-AnnualReport2015.pdf

Performance monitoring for cervical cancer screening programs in Canada: report from the screening performance indicators working group, Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control Network (CCPCN) [Internet]. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2009 [cited 2020 Nov 12]. Available from: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cd-mc/cancer/pmccspc-srpdccuc/pdf/cervical-eng.pdf

Public Health England NSP. NHS cervical screening programme: colposcopy and programme management [Internet]. London: NHS Cervical Screening Programme; 2016 [cited 2020 Nov 12]. Available from: https://www.bsccp.org.uk/assets/file/uploads/resources/NHSCSP_20_Colposcopy_and_Programme_Management_(3rd_Edition)_(2).pdf

Dias MBK, Tomazelli JG, Assis M. Rastreamento do câncer de colo do útero no Brasil: análise de dados do Siscolo no período de 2002 a 2006. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2010;19(3):293-306. doi: http://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742010000300011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742010000300011

Corrêa CSL, Lima AS, Leite ICG, et al. Rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero em Minas Gerais: avaliação a partir de dados do Sistema de Informação do Câncer do Colo do Útero (SISCOLO). Cad Saúde Colet. 2017;25(3):315-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-462X201700030201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-462x201700030201

Bortolon PC, Silva MAF, Côrrea FM, et al. Avaliação da qualidade dos laboratórios de citopatologia do colo do útero no Brasil. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2012;58(3):435-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2012v58n3.600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2012v58n3.600

Magalhães JC, Morais LSF, Plewka J, et al. Evaluation of quality indicators of cervical cytopathology tests carried out in a municipality of Paraná, Brazil. J Bras Patol Med Lab. 2020;56:1-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.5935/1676-2444.20200041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/1676-2444.20200041

Ribeiro CM, Santos Silva I, Eluf-Neto J, et al. Follow-up of women screened for cervical cancer in São Paulo, Brazil: an analysis of the times to diagnostic investigation and treatment. Cancer Epidemiol. 2021;72:101940. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2021.101940 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2021.101940

Girianelli VR, Azevedo e Silva G, Thuler LCS. Factors associated with the risk of progression to precursor lesions or cervical cancer in women with negative cytologic findings. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;107(3):228-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.036

Peres SV, Latorre MRDO, Michels FAS, et al. Determinação de um ponto de corte para a identificação de pares verdadeiros pelo método probabilístico de linkage de base de dados. Cad Saúde Colet. 2014;22(4):428-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-462X201400040017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-462X201400040017

R Foundation for Statistical Computing. The R Project for Statistical Computing. [computer program]. R version 3.1.1. [Internet]. Vienna, AT: The R foundation; 2014. [cited 2020 Oct 20]. Available from: https://www.R-project.org

Gasparin VA, Pitilin EB, Bedin R, et al. Fatores associados à representatividade da zona de transformação em exames citopatológicos do colo uterino. Cogit Enferm. 2016;21(2):1-9. doi: http://doi.org/10.5380/ce.v21i2.44241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/ce.v21i2.44241

Instituto Nacional de Câncer José de Alencar Gomes da Silva. Ficha técnica de indicadores das ações de controle do câncer do colo do útero [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2014 [acesso 2020 maio 10]. Disponível em: https://www.inca.gov.br/sites/ufu.sti.inca.local/files//media/document//fichatecnicaindicadorescolo14.pdf

Antunes JLF, Cardoso MRA. Uso da análise de séries temporais em estudos epidemiológicos. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2015;24(3):565-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742015000300024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742015000300024

Gujarati DN, Porter DC. Basic econometrics. 5th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin; 2009.

Callegari-Jacques SM. Bioestatística: princípios e aplicações. Porto Alegre, SC: Artmed; 2009.

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Portaria no 1.504, de 23 de julho de 2013. Institui a Qualificação Nacional em Citopatologia na prevenção do câncer do colo do útero (QualiCito), no âmbito da Rede de Atenção à Saúde das Pessoas com Doenças Crônicas [Internet]. Diário Oficial da União. 2013 jul 24 [acesso 2020 out 23]; Seção I:31. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2013/prt1504_23_07_2013.html

Ministério da Saúde (BR), Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Análise de Situação de Saúde. Plano de ações estratégicas para o enfrentamento das doenças crônicas não transmissíveis (DCNT) no Brasil, 2011-2022. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2011.

Ministério da Saúde. Portaria no 3.394, de 30 de dezembro de 2013. Institui o Sistema de Informação de Câncer (SISCAN) no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) [Internet]. Diário Oficial da União. 2013 dez 31 [acesso 2020 out 23]; Seção I:57. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2013/prt3394_30_12_2013.html

Santos RS, Melo ECP, Santos KM. Análise espacial dos indicadores pactuados para o rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero no Brasil. Texto Contexto - Enferm. 2012;21(4):800-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072012000400010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072012000400010

Bastos EA, Zardo LMG, Feitosa TMP, Almeida RT. Associação entre a qualidade da amostra e a detecção de atipias celulares no exame citopatológico do colo do útero. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2012;58(3):445-52. doi: https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2012v58n3.601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2012v58n3.601

Published

2022-02-08

How to Cite

1.
Dias MBK, Alcântara LL de M, Girianelli VR, Migowski A, Ribeiro CM, Tomazelli J. Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Aged 25 to 64 Years: Indicators of the First Cytopathological Examination Registered at Siscolo, 2007-2013. Rev. Bras. Cancerol. [Internet]. 2022 Feb. 8 [cited 2024 May 16];68(1):e-111520. Available from: https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1520

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2