Tratamento do mieloma múltiplo com VMCP: revisão de 52 casos

Authors

  • Carlos Frederico Distéfano Pinto Serviço de Oncologia Clínica da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte. Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil
  • Alexandre J. Fenelon Silva Serviço de Oncologia Clínica da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte. Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil
  • Wagner Brant Moreira Serviço de Oncologia Clínica da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte. Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil
  • Sebastião Cabral Filho Serviço de Oncologia Clínica da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte. Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil
  • Eduardo Nascimento Serviço de Oncologia Clínica da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte. Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil
  • Eugênio B. Lopes Serviço de Oncologia Clínica da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte. Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil
  • Eduardo C. Brandão Serviço de Oncologia Clínica da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte. Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil
  • João Augusto M. Teixeira Médico Assistente. Serviço de Oncologia Clínica. Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte. Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil
  • Maria do Carmo Vieira Médico Assistente. Serviço de Oncologia Clínica. Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte. Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil
  • Maria N. Alvares Médico Assistente. Serviço de Oncologia Clínica. Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte. Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil
  • Nedda Maria V. Novaes Médico Assistente. Serviço de Oncologia Clínica. Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte. Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.1994v40n4.3005

Keywords:

Multiple Myeloma, Chemotherapy, Prognostic Factors

Abstract

Fifty-two patients were treated for multiple myeloma between November 1987andAugust 1992 at the Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte General Hospital with VMCP (vincristine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide and prednisone) every28 days. Twenty-six patients with bone lesions received palliative radiotherapy. Fifteen (28.8%) were stage IIIA; 32 (61.5%) stage IIIB; five (7.6%) stage I and II by the Salmon and Durie staging system, as used by the SWOG. The response criteria used, when available, was also the proposed by SWOG. Seven patients reached the complete remission, 12 partial remission, 20had stable disease and 13 had progressiva disease. The overall survival was 41 months. Toxicity was well tolerated in the majority of the group. Grade 3-4 toxicity was reached at least once in 30.8%. Three patients died of neutropenic sepsis and 1 of gastrointestinal toxicity. Eight patients are lost of follow-up. The authors considered the actual regimen safe and with satisfactory results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALEXANIAN R, SALMON S, BONNET J et al. Combination therapy for multiple myeloma. Cancer 1977; 49: 2765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197712)40:6<2765::AID-CNCR2820400602>3.0.CO;2-X

BARTL R, FRISCH B, FATEH-MOGHADAM A, KETTNER G, SOMMERFIELDW. Histologic classification and staging of multiple myeloma: a retrospective and prospective study of 674 cases. Am JClin Pathol1987; 87: 342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/87.3.342

BERGSAGEL DE. Myeloma, melphalan and meta-analysis (Editorial). J Clin Oncol 1992; 10(2): 178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1992.10.2.178

BERGSAGELDE.Chemotherapyofmyeloma: Drug combinations versus single agents, an overview, and comments on acute leucemia in myeloma. Hematol Oncol 1988; 6; 159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.2900060216

BLADÉ J, SAN MIGUEL JF, ALCAL4 A et al. Alternating combination VMCP/VBAP chemotherapy versus melphalan/prednisone in treatment of multiple myeloma: a randomized multicentric study of 487 cases. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11; 1165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1993.11.6.1165

BOCCADORO M, MARMONT F, TRIBALTO M et al. Multiple myeloma: VMCPA/BAP alternating combination is not superior to melphalan and prednisone even in high risk patients. J Clin Oncol

; 9(3): 444.

BOCCADORO M, PILERI A. Standard chemotherapy for myelomatosis: an area of great controversy. Hematol/Oncol Clin North Am 1992; 6(2): 371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-8588(18)30350-2

BRUMINI R e cols. Câncer no Brasil - Dados Histopatológicos de 1976-1980, Campanha Nacional de Combate ao Câncer, Ministério da Saúde, 1982. Rio de Janeiro.

CUZICK J, De STAVOLA BL, COOPER EH et al. Long term prognostic value of serum B2 microglobulin in myelomatosis. Br J Haematol 1990; 75: 506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.1990.tb07790.x

CUZICK J, GALTON DAG, PETO R et al. MRO's Workint Party on Leukemia in Adults: Treatment comparisons in the third MRC myelomatosis trial. Br J Cancer 1980; 42: 823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1980.329

DURIE BGM. Chemotherapy of Myeloma: SWOG Studies. Hematol Oncol 1988; 6: 141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.2900060214

DURIE BGM, DIXON DO, CARTER S et al. Improved survival duralion with combination chemotherapy indution for multiple myeloma: a SWOG study. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4: 1227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1986.4.8.1227

DURIE BGM, SALMON SE. A clinical staging System for multiple myeloma. Correlation of measured myeloma cell with presenting clinical features, response treatment and survival. Câncer 1975; 36: 842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197509)36:3<842::AID-CNCR2820360303>3.0.CO;2-U

GREGORY WM, RICHARDS MA, MALPAS JS. Combination chemotherapy versus melphalan and prednisone in the treatment of multiple myeloma: an overview of the published trials. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10(2): 334, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1992.10.2.334

KELLY K, DURIE B, MacLENNAN A. Prognostic factors and staging Systems for multiple myeloma: comparisons between the MRC and the SWOG. Hematol Oncol 1988; 6: 131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.2900060213

KYLE RA. Prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Hematol Oncol 1988; 6: 125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.2900060212

MacLENNAN ICM, KELLY K, CROCKSON RA, COOPER EH, CUZICK J, CHAPMAN C. Results of the MRC myelomatosis trials for patients entered since 1980. Hematol Oncol 1988; 6: 145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.2900060215

SALMON SE, CASSADY JR. Plasma cell Neoplasms. In: DeVita V, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA. Cancer Principies & Practice of Oncology. 3rd Ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co, 1989: 1853.

Published

2023-06-05

How to Cite

1.
Pinto CFD, Silva AJF, Moreira WB, Cabral Filho S, Nascimento E, Lopes EB, Brandão EC, Teixeira JAM, Vieira M do C, Alvares MN, Novaes NMV. Tratamento do mieloma múltiplo com VMCP: revisão de 52 casos. Rev. Bras. Cancerol. [Internet]. 2023 Jun. 5 [cited 2024 May 17];40(4):207-13. Available from: https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/3005

Issue

Section

CASE REPORT

Most read articles by the same author(s)