Assessment of Quality Indicators in Cervical Cytopathology Tests from Unified Health System-Accredited Private Laboratories in the State of Goiás

Authors

  • Cinara Zago Silveira Ázara Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG). Goiânia (GO), Brasil.
  • Eduardo Silva Araújo Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Goiás. Goiânia (GO), Brasil.
  • Juliana Cristina Magalhães Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Goiás. Goiânia (GO), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2332-7976
  • Rita Goreti Amaral Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Faculdade de Farmácia da Universidade Federal de Goiás. Goiânia (GO), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8890-0852

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2014v60n4.443

Keywords:

Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis, Vaginal Smears, Quality Control, Education, Continuing, Brazil

Abstract

Introduction: Although there are quality control standards for cytopathology testing, most Brazilian laboratories show indicators below the expected. Objective: To evaluate five indicators for internal monitoring of the quality of Unified Health System-accredited private laboratories, monitored and non-monitored by an External Quality Monitoring Laboratory in the State of Goiás. Method: Cross-sectional study. A total of 153,258 tests performed in 44 laboratories were included, among which 14 were monitored e 30 non-monitored, from January 2012 to December 2012, using data from Siscolo. Results: The monitored laboratories showed 1,837 altered tests, with 855 atypical squamous cells, 905 intraepithelial lesions and 350 high grade intraepithelial lesions, while the non- monitored laboratories showed 2,535 altered tests, with 1,436 atypical squamous cells, 890 intraepithelial lesions, and 244 high grade intraepithelial lesions. Approximately 60% of the monitored laboratories and 26% of the non- monitored ones showed a positivity rate of ≥ 3%, while 72% of the monitored laboratories and 10% of the non- monitored ones showed a percentage of ≥ 0.4% of the tests compatible with high grade intraepithelial lesion among satisfactory tests. Approximately 7% of the monitored laboratories and 29% of the non-monitored ones showed a percentage of ≥ 60% of atypical squamous with undetermined significance among the altered studies. Conclusion: Most laboratories that presented indicators within the recommended parameters were participating in the monitoring process of external quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2014-12-31

How to Cite

1.
Zago Silveira Ázara C, Silva Araújo E, Magalhães JC, Goreti Amaral R. Assessment of Quality Indicators in Cervical Cytopathology Tests from Unified Health System-Accredited Private Laboratories in the State of Goiás. Rev. Bras. Cancerol. [Internet]. 2014 Dec. 31 [cited 2024 Jul. 22];60(4):295-303. Available from: https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/443

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Most read articles by the same author(s)