Análise Morfológica Comparativa da Carcinogênese Química Cutânea entre Camundongo (Mus Musculus) e Gerbilho (Meriones Unguiculatos)

Authors

  • Maria Angélica Guzmán Silva Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, (RJ), Brasil.
  • Jorge S. P. Guimarães Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, (RJ), Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.1986v32n1.3232

Keywords:

Chemical Skin Carcinogenesis, Cumulative Model, Biphasic Model, Gerbil

Abstract

The reaction of the gerbil’s skin to the Chemical induetion of tumors was studied, comparing the early morphologic alterations ocurring in the gerbil to the ones we have also studied in the mouse. Two models of carcinogenesis were used: the cumulative with methylcholanthrene and the biphasic using methylcolanthrene as initiator, followed by croton oil as promoter. The gross findings, such as thickening of the skin and hyperemia induced by the various experiments above, were less evident in the gerbils. The microscopic findings of hyperplasia and inflammatory reaction, were aIso less intense in the gerbii's skin. The cellular proliferation wassimulated, as shown by increased mitotic rate, without any recognizable progressiva hyperplasia of the epidermis with the cumulative modelelectron microscopy displayed a less evident dilatation of intercellular space in the interfollicular epidermis of gerbils than that observed in mice, and the induction of "dark cells" was not registered in gerbils, up to the 10th week of treatment. Gerbils did not show any "dark cell" with the biphasic model, and the initial minimal dilatation of the intercellular space disappeared despite the continuing treatment It has been demonstrated that the skin of the gerbil is more resistant to chemical carcinogenesis than that of the mouse. Gerbils did not develop any papiloma up to the 30th week of treatment with the biphasic model, while mice developed such tumors after a seven-week latency period. With the cumulative model, both gerbil and mouse each developed one papilloma, but the latter did so after ten weeks of treatment, while the former took fifteen weeks. The results suggest that the relative resistence of the gerbil’s skin to Chemical carcinogenesis in based upon and adaptation to the promotion process, specially with the croton oil.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Becker FF. Recent concepts of initiation and promotion in carcinogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 1981,-105(1): 3-9.

Boutwell RK. Some biological aspects of skin carcinogenesis. Prog. exp. Tumor Res. 1964; 4: 207-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000385978

Boutwell RK, Verma AK, Ashendel CL, Astrup E. Mouse skin: a usefui model system for studying the mechanism of Chemical carcinogenesis. Carcinog. Compr. Surv. 1982; 7:1-12.

Guzmán Silva MA, Guimarães JSP. Carcinogênese química cutânea. Rev. Bras. Cancerol. 1985; 31: 285-291.

Ryses HJP. Chemical carcinogenesis. New Engl. J. Med. 1971; 285 (13): 721-734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197109232851305

Scribner JD, Süss R. Tumor initiation and promotion. Int. Rev. exp. Pathol. 1978; 18: 137-198.

Slaga TJ, Fischer SM, Weeks CE, Klein-Szanto AJP, Reiners J. Studies on the mechanism involved in multistage carcinogenesis in mouse skin. J. cell. Biochem. 1982;18(1): 99-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.1982.240180109

Slaga TJ, Fischer SM, Weeks CE, Nelson K, Mamrack M, Klein-Szanto AJP. Specificity and mechanism(s) of promoter inhibitors in multistage promotion. Carinog. Compr. Surv. 1982; 7: 19-34.

Slaga TJ, Klein-Szanto AJP. Initiation-promotion versus complete skin carcinogenesis in mice: importance of dark basal Keratinocytes (stem cells). Cancer Invest 1983;1(5): 425-436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/07357908309048511

Weinstein IB, Troll W. National Câncer Institute workshop on tumor promotion and cofactors in carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1977; 37: 3461-3463.

Yuspa SH, Hennings H, Saffiotti U. Cutaneous Chemical carcinogenesis: past, present and future. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1976; 67: 199-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12513040

Ashman LK, Murray AW, Cook MG, Kotiarski I. Two-stage skin carcinogenesis in sensitive and resistant mouse strains. Carcinogenesis 1982; 3(1): 99-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/3.1.99

Di Giovanni J. Slaga TJ, Juchau MR. Comparativa epidermal metabolism of mice with differing sensitivity to skin tumori-genesis by DMBA. Proc. Am. Assoe. Câncer Res. 1979; 20: 134.

Hennings H, Devor D, Wenk ML, et al. Comparison of two-stage epidermal carcinogenesis initiated by 7-12-dimethyl-benz(a) — anthracene of N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine in newborn and adult SENCAR and BALB/c mice. Cancer Res. 19’81; 41:773-779.

Legraverend C, Mansour B, Nebert DW, Holland JM. Genetic differences in benzo(a)pyrene-initiated tumorigenesis in mouse skin. Pharmacology 1980; 20 (5): 242-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000137370

Shubick P. Studies on the promoting phase in the stages of carcinogenesis in mice, rats, rabbits and guinea pigs. Cancer Res. 1950; 10:13-17.

Sisskin EE, Gray T, Barrett JC. Correlation between sensitivity to tumor promotion and sustained epidermal hyperplasia of mice and rats treated with 12-0-tetradecanolyphor-bol-13-acetate. Carcinogenesis 1982; 3 (4): 403-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/3.4.403

Stenbáck F. Skin carcinogenesis as a model system: observations on species strain and tissue sensitivity to 7,12-dime-thylbenz (a) anthracene with or without promotion from crotonoil. Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1980: 46(2): 89-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0773.1980.tb02426.x

Salaman MH, Roe FJC. Cocarcionigenesis. Br. med. Bull. 1964; 20 (21:139-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070307

Fischer SM, Gleason, GL, Bohrman JS, Slaga TJ. Prostaglandin enhancement of skin tumor initiation and promotion. Adv. Prostaglandin Thromboxane Res. 1980; 6: 517-522.

Frei JV, Stephens P. The correlation of promotion of tumor growth and of induction of hyperplasia in epidermal two-stage carcinogenesis. Br. J. Cancer 1968; 22: 83-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1968.12

Fürstenberger G, Berry DL, Sorg B, Marks F. Skin tumor promotion by phorbol esters is a two-stage process. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1981; 78(12) .7722-7726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.78.12.7722

Fürstenberger G, Sorg B, Marks F. Tumor promotion by phorbol esters in skin: evidence for a memory effect. Science 1983; 220: 89-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6828884

Pound AW. Carcinogenesis and cell proliferation. N.Z. med. J. 1968; 67: 88-99.

Setalà K, Merenmies L, Stjernvall L, Aho Y, Kajanne P. Mechanism of experimental tumorigenesis. I . Epidermal hyperplasia in mouse caused by locally applied tumor initiator and dipole-type tumor promoter. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1959; 23.925-951.

Slaga TJ, Fischer SM, Weeks CE, Klein-Szanto AJP. Multistage Chemical carcinogenesis in mouse skin. Curr. Probl. Dermatol. 1980; 10: 193-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000396290

Berenbium I. A speculative review; the probable nature of promoting action and its significance in the understanding of the mechanism of carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1954; 14(7): 471-477.

Setälä' K, Merenmies L, Niskanen EE, Nyholm M, Stjern vall L. Mechanisms of experimental tumorigenesis. VI. Ultrastructural alterations in mouse epidermis caused by locally applied carcinogen and dipole-type tumor promoter. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1960; 25: 11 55-1189.

Raick AN, Ritchie AC. The fine structural changes induced in the epidermis by croton oil fraction Aj and two stage carcinogenesis in mouse skin. Proc. Am. Assoe. Cancer Res. 197.1; 12:66.

Klein-Szanto AJP, Slaga TJ. Numerical variation of dark cells in normal and chemically induced hyperplastic epidermis with age of animal and efficiency of tumor promoter. Cancer Res. 1981; 41 (11 Parti): 4437-4440.

Raick AN. Ultrastructural, histological and biochemical alterations produced by 12-0-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate on mouse epidermis and their relevance to skin tumor promotion. Câncer Res. 1973; 33: 269-286.

Raick AN. Cell differentiation and tumor-promoting action in skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1974; 34: 291 5-2925.

Schwentker V. The gerbil. A new laboratory animal. Illinois Vet. 1963; 6: 5-9.

Handler AH, Magalini SI, Pav D. Oncogenic studies on the Mongolian gerbil. Cancer Res. 1966; 26: 844-847.

McDonald CJ, Quevedo Jr. WC, Bienieki TC, Fausto N. Role of melanocytes in responses of the skin of Mongolian gerbils to Chemical carcinogens. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1970; 54 92.

Quevedo Jr WC, Bienieki TC, Fausto N, Magalini SI. Induction of pigmentary changes in the skin of the Mongolian gerbil by Chemical carcinogens. Experientia 1968; 24: 585-586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02153788

Van Duuren BL. Tumor promoting agents in two-stage carcinogenesis. Prog. exp. Tumor Res. 1969; 11 :51-68.

Burke TJ. Rats, mice, hamsters and gerbils. Vet. Clin. North Am.: Small Anim. Pract. 1979; 9(3): 473-486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-5616(79)50057-6

Behmer OA, Castro de Tolosa EM, Freitas Neto AG. Manual de técnicas para histologia normal e patológica. São Paulo: EDART-EDUSP, 1976: 117.

Pearse AGE. Histochemistry. Theoretical and applied 2nd ed. London: J & A. ChurchilI Ltd., 1960: 919.

Zugibe FT. Diagnostic histochemistry. Saint Louis: C. V. Mosby Company, 1970: 257.

Humphrey CD, Pittman FE. A simple methylene blue-azure II — basib fuchsin stain for epoxy-embebbed tissue sections. Stain Technol. 1974:49(1):9-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/10520297409116929

Reynolds ES. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 1963; 17:208-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.17.1.208

Strauss JS, Matoltsy AG. Pele. In: Weiss L, Greep RO. Histologia. 4. ed. Rio de Janãiro: Guanabara Koogan, 1981: 501.

Berenbium I, Shubick P. A new, quantitative approach to the study of the stages of Chemical carcinogenesis in mouse's skin. Br. J. Cancer 1947; 1 ; 383-391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1947.36

Tarin D. Sequential electron microscopical study of experimental mouse skin carcinogenesis. Int. J. Cancer 1967; 2: 195-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910020302

Setälä K, Merenmies L, Stjernavall L, Nyholm M. Mechanism of experimental tumorigenesis. IV. Ultrastrueture of interfollicular epidermis of normal adult mouse. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1960; 24: 329-353.

Lever WF. Histopathology of the skin. 5th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company, 1975: 9-45.

Argyris TS. Epidermal growth following a single application of 12-0-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate in mice. Am J. Pathol. 1980: 98(3) 639-648.

Raick AN, Thumm K, Chivers BR. Early effects of 12-0-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate on the incorporation of tritiated precursors into DNA and the thickness of the interfollicular epidermis, and their relation to tumor promotion in mouse skin. Câncer Res. 1972; 32:1 562-1 568.

Fenske M. Produetion of steroids by in vitro superfusion from adrenals of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus): effect of acute stress. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. lAI 1983; 74(4)971-976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(83)90379-1

Quevedo Jr. WC, Fleischmann RD, Dyckman J, Jimbow K, Bienieki TC. Ultrastructural observations on DMBA-induced dermal hyperpigmentation and blue nevus-like tumors in the Mongolian gerbil. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 1980; 163(4) :461-468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-163-40797

Published

2023-08-07

How to Cite

1.
Guzmán Silva MA, Guimarães JSP. Análise Morfológica Comparativa da Carcinogênese Química Cutânea entre Camundongo (Mus Musculus) e Gerbilho (Meriones Unguiculatos). Rev. Bras. Cancerol. [Internet]. 2023 Aug. 7 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];32(1):31-42. Available from: https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/3232

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE