Estrategias para la Prevención del Seroma en Pacientes Sometidas a Tratamiento Quirúrgico por Cáncer de Mama: Revisión Sistemática de la Literatura

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2024v70n2.4616

Palabras clave:

Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía, Seroma/prevención & control, Revisión

Resumen

Introducción: El cáncer de mama es la neoplasia más común en las mujeres. Aunque su tratamiento ha evolucionado en las últimas décadas, la cirugía sigue siendo el abordaje principal. Los pacientes sometidos a tratamiento quirúrgico pueden experimentar complicaciones postoperatorias como el seroma, definido como una acumulación anormal de líquido seroso que se desarrolla debajo de los colgajos de piel. La presencia de esta complicación puede afectar la calidad de vida de los pacientes, lo que podría generar la necesidad de punciones repetidas, nuevos procedimientos quirúrgicos y retrasos en el tratamiento adyuvante. Objetivo: Realizar una revisión sistemática de la literatura científica sobre los procedimientos utilizados para prevenir el seroma en pacientes sometidas a tratamiento quirúrgico por cáncer de mama, correlacionando sus ventajas y desventajas. Metodología: Se basó en la Colaboración Cochrane. Para identificar estudios relevantes, se realizaron búsquedas en las siguientes bases de datos: MEDLINE vía PubMed, PEDro, Cochrane Library y LILACS. La calidad metodológica de los ensayos clínicos se evaluó mediante la escala PEDro y la de los estudios observacionales, mediante la escala Newcastle-Ottawan. Esta revisión fue registrada en la base de datos de registro de PROSPERO, bajo el número CRD42024506834. Resultados: Se identificaron 405 artículos y, luego de la evaluación, se incluyeron para el análisis 24 artículos. Conclusión: Hasta la fecha, la formación de seroma no se puede evitar por completo; sin embargo, los estudios que se han centrado en eliminar el espacio muerto, ya sea utilizando suturas acolchadas o selladores, han mostrado resultados prometedores en la reducción de esta complicación. Se necesita más investigación para una comparación más exhaustiva de los enfoques y una mejor comprensión de su eficacia.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, et al. Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends--an update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(1):16-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0578

Tarantino P, Viale G, Press MF, et al. ESMO expert consensus statements (ECS) on the definition, diagnosis, and management of HER2-low breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2023;34(8):645-59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.05.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.05.008

Santos MO, Lima FCS, Martins LFL, et al. Estimativa de incidência de câncer no Brasil, 2023-2025. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2023;69(1):e-213700. doi: https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2023v69n1.3700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2023v69n1.3700

Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, et al. Breast cancer, version 3.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20(6):691-722. doi: https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030

Czajka ML, Pfeifer C. Breast cancer surgery [Internet]. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2024. [acesso 2024 jan 12]. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553076/

Al-Hilli Z, Wilkerson A. Breast surgery: management of postoperative complications following operations for breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2021;101(5):845-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2021.06.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2021.06.014

Jordan SW, Khavanin N, Kim JYS. Seroma in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(4):1104-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000481102.24444.72 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000481102.24444.72

Isozaki H, Yamamoto Y, Murakami S, et al. Impact of the surgical modality for axillary lymph node dissection on postoperative drainage and seroma formation after total mastectomy. Patient Saf Surg. 2019;13:20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-019-0199-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-019-0199-z

Bosman J, Piller N. Lymph taping and seroma formation post breast cancer. J Lymphoedema. 2010;5(2):45-52.

Lin W, Yang Y, Zhong W, et al. The effect of low and high vacuum drainage on the postoperative drainage of breast cancer: insights from a prospective, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:12487-96. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s283031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S283031

Findik UY, Topcu SY, Vatansever O. Effects of drains on pain, comfort and anxiety in patients undergone surgery. Int J Caring Sci. 2013;6(3):412.

University of York. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. New York: University of York; 2019. PROSPERO - International prospective register of systematic reviews. 2023. [acesso 2023 ago 31]. Disponível em: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/

PEDro: Escala PEDro [Internet]. Database Physiotherapy Evidence. Sydney: Universidade de Sydney; IMH; 1999. [acesso 2024 jan 23]. Disponível em: https://pedro.org.au/portuguese/resources/pedro-scale/

Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell DA, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses [Internet]. Oxford: The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2000. [acesso 2024 jan 23]. Disponível em: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp

Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. Prisma 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160

Seenivasagam KR, Gupta V, Singh G. Prevention of seroma formation after axillary dissection--a comparative randomized clinical trial of three methods. Breast J. 2013;19(5):478-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12164

Rooij L, van Kuijk SMJ, Granzier RWY, et al. reducing seroma formation and its sequelae after mastectomy by closure of the dead space: a multi-center, doubleblind randomized controlled trial (SAM-Trial). Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(5):2599-2608. doi: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09225-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09225-8

Benevento R, Santoriello A, Pellino G, et al. The effects of low-thrombin fibrin sealant on wound serous drainage, seroma formation and length of postoperative stay in patients undergoing axillary node dissection for breast cancer. A randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg.

;12(11):1210-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.005

Kuş A, Yörükoğlu UH, Aksu C, et al. Efeito do bloqueio paravertebral torácico na redução de seroma em cirurgia de mama – estudo randomizado controlado. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020;70(3):215-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2019.12.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2019.12.015

Baker E, Piper J. Drainless mastectomy: is it safe and effective? Surgeon. 2017;15(5):267-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2015.12.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2015.12.007

Vasileiadou K, Kosmidis C, Anthimidis G, et al. Cyanoacrylate adhesive reduces seroma production after modified radical mastectomy or quadrantectomy with lymph node dissection-a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017;17(8):595-600. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2017.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2017.04.004

Piñero-Madrona A, Castellanos-Escrig G, Abrisqueta-Carrión J, et al. Prospective randomized controlled study to assess the value of a hemostatic and sealing agent for preventing seroma after axillary lymphadenectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(4):423-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24344

Boeer B, Schneider J, Schoenfisch B, et al. Lysineurethane-based tissue adhesion for mastectomyan approach to reducing the seroma rate? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;303(1):181-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05801-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05801-1

Garza-Gangemi AM, Barquet-Muñoz SA, Villarreal-Colín SP, et al. Randomized phase II study of talc versus iodopovidone for the prevention of seroma formation following modified radical mastectomy. Rev Invest Clin. 2015;67(6):357-65.

Myint ST, Khaing KS, Yee W, et al. Quilting suture versus conventional closure in prevention of seroma after total mastectomy and axillary dissection in breast cancer patients. ANZ J Surg. 2020;90(7-8):1408-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16091

Qvamme G, Axelsson CK, Lanng C, et al. Randomized clinical trial of prevention of seroma formation after mastectomy by local methylprednisolone injection. Br J Surg. 2015;102(10):1195-203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9874 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9874

Zhao J, Su F, Hu Y, et al. Prospective comparison of Sapylin and Avitene for reducing hydrops after axillary lymphadenectomy in breast cancer patients. J Surg Res. 2017;210:8-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.10.032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.10.032

Yang Y, Gao E, Liu X, et al. Effectiveness of OK-432 (Sapylin) to reduce seroma formation after axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(5):1500-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2728-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2728-1

Khan MA. Effect of preoperative intravenous steroids on seroma formation after modified radical mastectomy. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017;29(2):207-10.

ten Wolde B, van den Wildenberg FJ, Keemers-Gels ME, et al. Quilting prevents seroma formation following breast cancer surgery: closing the dead space by quilting prevents seroma following axillary lymph node dissection and mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(3):802-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3359-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3359-x

Ouldamer L, Caille A, Giraudeau B, et al. Quilting suture of mastectomy dead space compared with conventional closure with drain. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(13):4233-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4511-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4511-6

Mazouni C, Mesnard C, Cloutier AS, et al. Quilting sutures reduces seroma in mastectomy. Clin Breast Cancer. 2015;15(4):289-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2014.12.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2014.12.014

Selvendran S, Cheluvappa R, Tr Ng VK, et al. Efficacy of harmonic focus scalpel in seroma prevention after axillary clearance. Int J Surg. 2016;30:116-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.041

Kong D, Liu Y, Li Z, et al. OK-432 (Sapylin) reduces seroma formation after axillary lymphadenectomy in breast cancer. J Invest Surg. 2017;30(1):1-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2016.1204386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2016.1204386

van Bastelaar J, Beckers A, Snoeijs M, et al. Flap fixation reduces seroma in patients undergoing mastectomy: a significant implication for clinical practice. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0830-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0830-8

Conversano A, Mazouni C, Thomin A, et al. Use of low-thrombin fibrin sealant glue after axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer to reduce hospital length and seroma. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017;17(4):293-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2016.12.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2016.12.013

van Bastelaar J, Theunissen LLB, Snoeijs MGJ, et al. Flap fixation using tissue glue or sutures appears to reduce seroma aspiration after mastectomy for breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017;17(4):316-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2017.01.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2017.01.005

Huang J, Wang S, Wu Y, et al. Conventional suture with prolonged timing of drainage is as good as quilting suture in preventing seroma formation at pectoral area after mastectomy. World J Surg Oncol. 2021;19(1):148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02257-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02257-8

van Zeelst LJ, Ten Wolde B, van Eekeren RRJP, et al. Quilting following mastectomy reduces seroma, associated complications and health care consumption without impairing patient comfort. J Surg Oncol. 2022;125(3):369-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26739

Gambardella C, Clarizia G, Patrone R, et al. Advanced hemostasis in axillary lymph node dissection for locally advanced breast cancer: new technology devices compared in the prevention of seroma formation. BMC Surg. 2019;18(Suppl 1):125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-018-0454-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-018-0454-8

Srivastava V, Basu S, Shukla VK. Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery: what we have learned in the last two decades. J Breast Cancer. 2012;15(4):373-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.373

Publicado

2024-06-19

Cómo citar

1.
Santos DV de A dos, Fabro EAN, Medeiros Costa R, Nunes de Lucena R, Venda MA da, Torres DM. Estrategias para la Prevención del Seroma en Pacientes Sometidas a Tratamiento Quirúrgico por Cáncer de Mama: Revisión Sistemática de la Literatura. Rev. Bras. Cancerol. [Internet]. 19 de junio de 2024 [citado 22 de julio de 2024];70(2):e-164616. Disponible en: https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/4616

Número

Sección

REVISIÓN DE LA LITERATURA

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a