Cervical Cancer Mortality in Northeastern Municipalities: Correlation with Sociodemographic Indicators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2023v69n3.3993Keywords:
uterine cervical neoplasms/mortality, spatial analysis, health status indicators, socioeconomic factorsAbstract
Introduction: Cervical cancer mortality is considered preventable. High rates and an upward temporal trend and observed in Brazil’s Northeast. Objective: To evaluate the spatial distribution of cervical cancer mortality of municipalities in Brazil’s Northeast in the period 2015-2019 and its correlation with sociodemographic indicators. Method: Mortality data were obtained from DATASUS Mortality Information System. Mortality rates per 100,000 women were calculated and smoothed using the empirical Bayesian estimator. The spatial correlation of mortality rates was evaluated using the global and local Moran index. Moreover, the correlation between mortality rates and sociodemographic indicators was tested using bivariate analysis. Mapping and analyzes were performed using GeoDa and R software, values of p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Rates ranged from 1.0 to 27.2 deaths per 100,000 women, with the highest rates concentrated in the municipalities of Maranhão, Piauí, Ceará, Alagoas, and Sergipe. Clusters with high mortality were observed in the municipalities of Maranhão and Piauí (close to Maranhão) on the coast of Pernambuco, Alagoas, Sergipe, and Bahia. An association between socioeconomic indicators and mortality by cervical cancer was found. Municipalities with the worst indicators show higher mortality rates by this neoplasm. Conclusion: High mortality rates were observed in municipalities with the worst sociodemographic indicators, indicating the health system’s limitations in reducing these rates in cities with low socioeconomic development.
Downloads
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
Fidler MM, Bray F, Soerjomataram I. The global cancer burden and human development: a review. Scand J Public Health. 2018;46(1):27-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817715400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817715400
Bergman H, Buckley BS, Villanueva G, et al. Comparison of different human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine types and dose schedules for prevention of HPV-related disease in females and males. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;2019(11):CD013479. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013479
Lemp JM, De Neve JW, Bussmann H, et al. Lifetime prevalence of cervical cancer screening in 55 low- and middle-income countries. JAMA. 2020;324(15):1532-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.16244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.16244
Santos MO, Lima FCS, Martins LFL, et al. Estimativa de incidência de câncer no Brasil, 2023-2025. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2023;69(1):e-213700. doi: https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2023v69n1.3700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2023v69n1.3700
Girianelli VR, Gamarra CJ, Silva GA. Disparities in cervical and breast cancer mortality in Brazil. Rev Saúde Pública. 2014;48(3):459-67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005214
Meira KC, Silva GWS, Santos J, et al. Analysis of the effects of the age-period-birth cohort on cervical cancer mortality in the Brazilian Northeast. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0226258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226258
Meira KC, Magnago C, Mendonça AB, et al. Inequalities in temporal effects on cervical cancer mortality in states in different geographic regions of Brazil: an ecological study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(9):5591. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095591
Gamarra CJ, Valente JG, Silva GA. Magnitude of mortality from cervical cancer in the Brazilian Northeast and socioeconomic factors. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2010;28(2):100-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1020-49892010000800005
Silva GA, Jardim BC, Ferreira VM, et al. Mortalidade por câncer nas capitais e no interior do Brasil: uma análise de quatro décadas. Rev Saúde Pública. 2020;54:126. doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002255
Reis NVS, Andrade BB, Guerra MR, et al. The global burden of disease study estimates of Brazil’s cervical cancer burden. Ann Glob Health. 2020;86(1):56. doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2756 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2756
SINASC: Sistema de Informações sobre Nascidos Vivos [Internet]. Versão 3.2. Brasília (DF): DATASUS. [data desconhecida] - [acesso 2022 mar 10]. Disponível em: http://sinasc.saude.gov.br/default.asp
Malta DC, Oliveira AJ. Análise de tendência de citologia oncótica e mamografia das capitais brasileiras. Cien Cult. 2014;66(1):25-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21800/S0009-67252014000100012
Theme Filha MM, Leal MC, Oliveira EFV, et al. Regional and social inequalities in the performance of Pap test and screening mammography and their correlation with lifestyle: Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15(1):136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0430-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0430-9
Ribeiro CM, Silva GA. Assessment of the production of cervical cancer care procedures in the Brazilian National Health System in 2015. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2018;27(1):e20172124. doi: https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742018000100004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742018000100004
Silva MJS, O’Dwyer G, Osorio-de-Castro CGS. Cancer care in Brazil: structure and geographical distribution. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):987. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6190-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6190-3
Kienen N, Bittencourt L, Pelloso SM, et al. Cervical cancer screening among underscreened and unscreened Brazilian women: training community health workers to be agents of change. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(1S):111-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2018.0026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2018.0026
Tsuchiya CT, Lawrence T, Klen MS, et al. O câncer de colo do útero no Brasil: uma retrospectiva sobre as políticas públicas voltadas à saúde da mulher. J Bras Econ Saúde. 2017;9(1):137-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.21115/JBES.V9.N1.P137-47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21115/JBES.v9.n1.p137-47
Thuler LCS, Aguiar SS, Bergmann A. Determinantes do diagnóstico em estadio avançado do câncer do colo do útero no Brasil. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2014;36(6):237-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-720320140005010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-720320140005010
Oliveira NPD. Desigualdades no diagnóstico e mortalidade por câncer de mama e colo do útero no Brasil [tese]. Rio Grande do Norte (RN): Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; 2020.
Stevens GA, Alkema L, Black RE, et al. Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement. Lancet. 2016;388(10062):e19-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30388-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30388-9
SIM: Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade [Internet]. Versão 3.2.1.2. Brasília (DF): DATASUS. [data desconhecida] - [acesso 2022 jul 5]. Disponível em: http://sim.saude.gov.br/default.asp
Organização Mundial da Saúde. CID-10: Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e problemas relacionados à saúde. São Paulo: Edusp; 2008.
Freire FHMA, Gonzaga MR, Gomes MMF. Projeções populacionais por sexo e idade para pequenas áreas no Brasil. Rev Latinoam Poblac. 2019;13(26):124-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.31406/relap2020.v14.i1.n26.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31406/relap2020.v14.i1.n26.6
Loos AH, Bray F, McCarron P, et al. Sheep and goats: separating cervix and corpus uteri from imprecisely coded uterine cancer deaths, for studies of geographical and temporal variations in mortality. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(18):2794-803. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.09.007
Doll R, Payne P, Waterhouse J. Cancer incidence in five continents: a technical report. Berlin: Springer-Verlarg; 1966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85849-9
Sousa CAM, Silva CMFP, Souza ER. Determinantes dos homicídios no Estado da Bahia, Brasil, em 2009. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2014;17(1):135-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1415-790X201400010011ENG DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1415-790X201400010011ENG
Bailey TC, Gatrell AC. Interactive spatial data analysis. Londres: Longman Scientific; 1995.
Druck S, Carvalho MS, Câmara G, et al. Análise espacial de dados geográficos. Brasília (DF): Embrapa; 2004.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; [data desconhecida]. Malhas municipal: acesso ao produto 2022; [acesso 2022 dez 15]. Disponível em: https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias/organizacao-do-territorio/malhas-territoriais/15774-malhas.html
FIRJAN [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: FIRJAN; c2023. Índice FIRJAN de desenvolvimento municipal (IFDM); [acesso 2022 jun 4]. Disponível em: https://www.firjan.com.br/ifdm
Conselho Nacional de Saúde (BR). Resolução nº 510, de 7 de abril de 2016. Dispõe sobre as normas aplicáveis a pesquisas em Ciências Humanas e Sociais cujos procedimentos metodológicos envolvam a utilização de dados diretamente obtidos com os participantes ou de informações identificáveis ou que possam acarretar riscos maiores do que os existentes na vida cotidiana, na forma definida nesta Resolução [Internet]. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF. 2016 maio 24 [acesso 2023 mar 15]; Seção 1:44. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/cns/2016/res0510_07_04_2016.html
Araújo TB. Tendências do desenvolvimento regional recente no Brasil. In: Brandão C, Siqueira H, organizadores. Pacto federativo, integração nacional e desenvolvimento regional. São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo; 2013. p. 39-51.
Victora CG, Vaughan JP, Barros FC, et al. Explaining trends in inequities: evidence from Brazilian child health studies. Lancet. 2000;356(9235):1093-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02741-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02741-0
Viacava F, Bellido JG. Health, access to services and sources of payment, according to household surveys. Cien Saúde Colet. 2016;21(2):351-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015212.19422015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015212.19422015
Oliveira MM, Andrade SSCA, Oliveira PPV, et al. Cobertura de exame Papanicolaou em mulheres de 25 a 64 anos, segundo a Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde e o Sistema de Vigilância de Fatores de Risco e Proteção para Doenças Crônicas por Inquérito Telefônico, 2013. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2018;21:e180014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720180014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720180014
Sousa AMV, Teixeira CCA, Medeiros SS, et al. Mortalidade por câncer do colo do útero no estado do Rio Grande do Norte, no período de 1996 a 2010: tendência temporal e projeções até 2030. Epidemiol Serv Saud. 2016;25(2):311-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742016000200010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742016000200010
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. doi: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
Guimarães RM, Muzi CD, Teixeira MP, et al. A transição da mortalidade por cânceres no brasil e a tomada de decisão estratégica nas políticas públicas de saúde da mulher. Rev Polit Públicas. 2016;20(1):33-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.18764/2178-2865.v20n1p35-50 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18764/2178-2865.v20n1p35-50
Melo AC, Silva JL, Santos ALS, et al. Population-based trends in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Brazil: focusing on black and indigenous population disparities. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 jan 17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-023-01516-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-023-01516-6
Mendes EV. O lado oculto de uma pandemia: a terceira onda da covid-19 ou o paciente invisível. Brasília (DF): Conselho Nacional de Secretários de Saúde; 2020.
Marques NP, Silveira DMM, Marques NCT, et al. Cancer diagnosis in Brazil in the COVID-19 era. Semin Oncol. 2021;48(2):156-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.12.002
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Os direitos morais e intelectuais dos artigos pertencem aos respectivos autores, que concedem à RBC o direito de publicação.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
