Function and Quality of Life after Breast Cancer: Limits and Alternatives to Classic PROMs

Authors

  • Adrián Jesús Barrios-Condori Servicio de Oncología, Hospital Hipólito Unanue. Tacna, Perú. Sociedad Peruana de Oncología Médica (SPOM). https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9319-9706

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2026v72n2.5693

Keywords:

Breast Neoplasms/surgery, Postoperative Period, Quality of Life, Lymphedema/surgery

Abstract

The letter to the editor analyzes and comments the study by Cardoso et al. that evaluated the functionality of the upper limbs, fatigue and quality of life of women submitted to breast cancer surgical treatment at a reference hospital in the Amazon region. The author acknowledges the clinical relevance and highlights the combined use of self- reported measures (QuickDASH, FACT-B+4, FACT-F) and an objective measure (isokinetic dynamometry) aligned with the current recommendations for multimodal evaluation. However, it argues that the choice of the instruments can limit the full understanding of functional sequelae, particularly in relation to lymphedema and its specific psychosocial impact. There are alternative and complementary PROMs as ULFI, SPADI, LYMQOL-Arm, ULL-27, LYMPH-Q and PROMIS Upper Extremity that capture comprehensively lymphedema-related functional aspects, specific symptoms and quality of life. The manuscript analyzes the advantages and limitations of the instruments utilized in the original study and emphasizes that the dynamometry, although objective, does not always reflect the functional performance of the activities of the daily life. Ultimately, the author proposes practical recommendations for future clinical records and studies, highlighting the combination of general and specific PROMs with objective measures as well as the importance of the longitudinal follow-up and adjusted analyzes to strengthen the clinical and scientific applicability of the investigation in this area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cardoso MCM, Araújo RS, Silva JP, et al. Evaluación de la funcionalidad de miembros superiores, calidad de vida y fatiga posoperatoria en mujeres con cáncer de mama en un hospital de referencia en la Amazonía. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2025;71(4):e-055271. doi: https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2025v71n4.5271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2025v71n4.5271

Marker RJ, Wechsler S, Leach HJ. Cancer-related fatigue is associated with objective measures of physical function before and after a clinical exercise program: a retrospective analysis. Rehabil Oncol. 2024;42(1):31-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.reo.0000000000000354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000354

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [Internet]. Rockville: AHRQ; 2025. What are patient-reported measures? 2025 [aceso 2025 nov 2]. Disponible en: https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/patient-experience/prems-proms/index.html

Martín-Martín J, Pajares-Hachero B, Alba-Conejo E, et al. Validation of the upper limb functional index on breast cancer survivor. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(6):4997. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064997

Vets N, De Groef A, Verbeelen K, et al. Assessing upper limb function in breast cancer survivors using wearable sensors and machine learning in a free-living environment. Sensors (Basel). 2023;23(13):6100. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23136100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23136100

Nuwayhid R, Warg ML, Heister S, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (LYMQOL) in german-speaking patients with lymphedema of the lower limbs. Healthcare. 2024;12(3):409. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030409

Kaur MN, Cornacchi SD, Tsangaris E, et al. Iterative qualitative approach to establishing content validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for arm lymphedema: the LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024;8(1):63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00701-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00701-3

HealthMeasures. User manual and scoring instructions: PROMIS physical function [Internet]. [sin ubicación]: PROMIS; 2025 nov 24 [aceso 2025 nov 2]. Disponible en: https://www.healthmeasures.net/images/PROMIS/manuals/Scoring_Manual_Only/PROMIS_Physical_Function_User_Manual_and_ Scoring_Instructions_10July2024.pdf

Macdonald ER, Amorim NML, Hagstrom AD, et al. Evaluating the effect of upper-body morbidity on quality of life following primary breast cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv. 2024;18(5):1517-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01395-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01395-0

Carpena-Niño MG, Altozano-Arroyo V, Cuesta-García C, et al. Impact of unilateral breast cancer surgery on upper limb functionality: strength, manual dexterity, and disability prediction. Healthcare. 2025;13(7):766. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13070766 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13070766

Oncu H, Calik-Kutukcu E, Yagli NV, et al. Reliability and validity of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test for functional exercise capacity in patients with breast cancer. Physiother Theory Pract. 2025;41(3):643-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2353260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2353260

Published

2026-04-17

How to Cite

1.
Barrios-Condori AJ. Function and Quality of Life after Breast Cancer: Limits and Alternatives to Classic PROMs. Rev. Bras. Cancerol. [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 17 [cited 2026 Apr. 25];72(2):e-295693. Available from: https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/5693

Issue

Section

LETTER TO THE EDITOR