The Cost the Tobacco Industry Does Not Account For!
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2025v71n2.5129Keywords:
Tobacco Industry/statistics & numerical data, Tobacco-Derived Products Publicity, Tobacco Use Disorder/mortality, Social Media, Costs and Cost AnalysisAbstract
Introduction: In Brazil, tobacco industry companies seek to maximize profits at the expense of a high disease and economic burden attributable to smoking. Objective: To estimate, based on the most recent national data on smoking behavior and the costs of tobacco-related diseases, the updated equivalence between the profit earned by the tobacco industry and the average cost to Brazilian society. Method: For the year 2019, two pieces of information from Brazil’s tobacco epidemic monitoring system were combined: (1) the equivalence between the gross profit of the tobacco industry and the deaths of smokers who contributed to generating this profit, with (2) the equivalence between the costs (both direct treatment costs and indirect costs) of tobacco-related diseases and deaths attributable to tobacco use. Results: For every R$1.0 of profit earned by the tobacco industry, Brazil spends 2.3 times that amount on the direct costs of treating tobacco-related diseases and 5.1 times that amount on the total costs of these diseases. Conclusion: It is essential to assess the impact of tobacco industry product sales on the current direct and indirect costs to Brazilian society in order to seek its accountability and compensation. A portion of the tobacco industry’s profit in Brazil may be allocated to initiatives that encourage smoking initiation among youth and children, ensuring the replacement of current users who will fall ill or die, thus also generating future costs.
Downloads
References
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2019: percepção do estado de saúde, estilos de vida, doenças crônicas e saúde bucal. Brasil e grandes regiões. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2020.
Receita Federal (BR) [Internet]. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Economia; [data desconhecida]. Regimes e controles especiais. [Acesso 2025 mar. 21]. Disponível em: https://receita.economia.gov.br/orientacao/tributaria/regimes-e-controles-especiais
Pinto M, Bardach A, Costa MGd, et al. Carga da doença e econômica atribuível ao tabagismo no Brasil e potencial impacto do aumento de preços por meio de impostos. Buenos Aires: IECS; 2024. [acesso 2025 fev. 26]. Disponível em: https://ninho.inca.gov. br/jspui/handle/123456789/15986
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (BR). Resolução Anvisa/DC nº 213 de 23 de janeiro de 2018. Dispõe sobre a exposição à venda e a comercialização de produtos fumígenos derivados do tabaco [Internet]. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF. 2018 jan 24 [acesso 2025 mar 21]; Seção 1. Disponível em: https://www.legisweb.com.br/legislacao/?id=355914
Organização Mundial da Saúde. Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. FCTC/COP8. Tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship: depiction of tobacco in entertainment media [Internet]. [acesso 2025 fev. 26]. Disponível em: https://fctc.who.int/docs/librariesprovider12/meeting-reports/cop8-report-en.pdf?
Kong G, Laestadius L, Vassey J, et al. Tobacco promotion restriction policies on social media. Tob Control. 2024;33(3):398-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2022-057348
Organização Mundial da Saúde. Tobacco industry interference with tobacco control. Genebra: WHO; 2008. [acesso 2025 fev. 26]. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/tobacco/publications/industry/interference/en/
Szklo AS, Lacerda Mendes F, Cavalcante TM, et al. Tobacco industry interference in Brazil: the necessity of settling accounts. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2020;66(2):e-11878. doi: https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2020v66n2.878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2020v66n2.878
Vosmirko NMS, Machado AT, Vianna CGF, et al. Fim de jogo para o tabagismo no Brasil. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2025;71(1):e-034922. doi: https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2025v71n1.4922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2025v71n1.4922
Szklo AS, Iglesias RM, Souza MC, et al. Understanding the relationship between sales of legal cigarettes and deaths: a case-study in Brazil. Prev Med. 2017;94:55-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.008
Pinto M, Bardach A, Palacios A, et al. Carga de doença atribuível ao uso do tabaco no Brasil e potencial impacto do aumento de preços por meio de impostos. Documento técnico N°21 [Internet]. Buenos Aires: IECS; 2017. [acesso 2025 fev 26]. Disponível em: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/7186
Thun MJ, Carter BD, Feskanich D, et al. 50-Year trends in smoking-related mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(4):351-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1211127
TABNET [Internet]. Brasília (DF): DATASUS. c2008 – [acesso 2025 fev 26]. Disponível em: https://datasus.saude.gov.br/informacoes-de-saude-tabnet/
Iglesias RM, Szklo AS, Souza MC, et al. Estimating the size of illicit tobacco consumption in Brazil: findings from the global adult tobacco survey. Tob Control. 2017;26(1):53-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052465
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo (IPCA) [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2019. [acesso 2025 fev. 26]. Disponível em: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/economicas/precos-e-custos/9256-indice-nacional-de-precos-ao-consumidor-amplo.html?t=downloads
Conselho Nacional de Saúde (BR). Resolução n° 510, de 7 de abril de 2016. Dispõe sobre as normas aplicáveis a pesquisas em Ciências Humanas e Sociais cujos procedimentos metodológicos envolvam a utilização de dados diretamente obtidos com os participantes ou de informações identificáveis ou que possam acarretar riscos maiores do que os existentes na vida cotidiana, na forma definida nesta Resolução [Internet]. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF. 2016 maio 24 [acesso 2025 fev 7]; Seção 1:44. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/cns/2016/res0510_07_04_2016.html
Assunta M. Global Tobacco Industry Interference Index 2023. Global Center for Good Governance in Tobacco Control (GGTC). Bangkok: GGTC; 2023.
Szklo AS, Carvalho A, Coutinho Marques de Pinho M, et al. Bitter taste of the tobacco industry interference in Brazil. Tob Control. 2024:tc-2024-058690. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058690
Sóñora G, Reynales-Shigematsu LM, Barnoya J, et al. Achievements, challenges, priorities and needs to address the current tobacco epidemic in Latin America. Tob Control. 2022;31(2):138-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057007
Perez CA, Veloso S, Viegas JR. Venda ilegal de produtos de tabaco e dispositivos eletrônicos para fumar (DEF) na internet [Internet]. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Justiça e Segurança Pública, Secretaria Nacional de Políticas sobre Drogas e Gestão de Ativos; 2024. [acesso 2025 mar. 21] 78 p. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/mj/pt-br/assuntos/sua-protecao/politicas-sobre-drogas/arquivo-manual-de-avaliacao-e-alienacao-de-bens/pnud_singles_v10.pdf/view
Szklo AS, Grilo G, Drope J. Maternal smoking prevalence in Brazil in 2013 and 2019: not what we expected when they were expecting! Nicotine Tob Res. 2024;26(12):1749-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae157
The United Nations [Internet]. Whasington, D. C.: 2000. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. [acesso 2025 fev. 26]. Disponível em: https://sdgs.un.org/goals
Szklo AS, Drope J. The cigarette market in Brazil: new evidence on illicit practices from the 2019 National Health Survey. Tob Control. 2024;33(Suppl 2):s128-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2022-057847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2022-057847
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Os direitos morais e intelectuais dos artigos pertencem aos respectivos autores, que concedem à RBC o direito de publicação.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.